Advisers brand Mifid call recording 'step too far' Advisers brand Mifid call recording 'step too far'

08 Feb 2017

The incoming Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (Mifid II) has indicated advisers must record all client phone conversations.

Tom Hegarty, managing director of the New Model Business Academy (NMBA), called Mifid II, which is set to be implemented on 3 January 2018, the "next industry regulation shake up", and said advisers had expressed deep concern about the details of what the new rules might mean.

Mr Hegarty said: "It is not clear yet how much of the proposed changes will be applied and imposed on our now ‘Brexit’ nation, but the part of Mifid II most reported on is the potential call recording requirement. 

"It is an unfortunate fact of our industry that almost no adviser is safe from the possibility of a client complaint and the experts at EU HQ feel the recording of all client telephone conversations will provide necessary protection against the innumerable future complaints of the advising population."

A survey carried out among members of NMBA revealed 85 per cent - out of 332 respondents to the poll - agreed this was a step too far. 

Mr Hegarty commented: "We had our largest response to a survey yet, with 332 of our NMBA members responding. This overwhelming response tells us that this is an emotive issue and one which advisers feel very strongly about."

According to Mr Hegarty, although once implemented it is likely the requirement would eventually become forgotten about, as it is unnoticeable, the problem goes far deeper.
He quoted responses from some of the NMBA members. Comments included:

“If you do the job right, if you genuinely have clients’ interests at heart, the need to recall every conversation doesn’t exist. You’ll never get a true conversation either – too guarded. It would, in my humble opinion, be madness to encourage this.”
“It should not be necessary and would restrict the extent to which the IFA could offer helpful comments which could later be misconstrued as “advice” by litigious individual encouraged by lawyers.”
That said, some members do already record calls. One member commented: “We have been recording calls both in and out since December 2010. It costs us just £1 plus VAT per month for each telephone number, with no hardware at our end.

"We save all our telephone calls (which are attached to emails) with our ISP, which costs us an extra £1.00 plus VAT per Gigabyte per month. Therefore the cost of recording/storage is extremely low and well worth the extra protection it offers us.”

Mr Hegarty added: "Clearly, a large proportion of NMBA members are concerned that call recording would undermine the trust that clients have for their adviser and are naturally reluctant to add another level of scrutiny and compliance.

"However, the costs of implementing this are low and it would provide an additional level of protection for both clients and advisers.

"If calls had to be compliance checked and audited, that would be a completely different story and almost definitely a step too far for most, although some advisers are happy to implement as much protection against themselves and their business as possible."

Whether call recording becomes a requirement or merely a recommendation is yet to be seen but Mr Hegarty pledged to continue "working closely with advisers to ensure that there is minimal disruption and cost if they do choose to record their calls and help allay concerns around trust and consumer understanding around this ‘Big Brother’ approach."

In 2016, FTAdviser raised concerns that, under Mifid II's requirement for all investment advice given over the phone to be recorded, all advisers' client conversations may have to be recorded.

At the time, Neil McCarthy, sales and marketing director for Lifequote, warned of the investment rules under Mifid II being replicated elsewhere in financial advice, including mortgage, pension and protection advice.

Earlier this year, the Association of Professional Financial Advisers called on the FCA to drop the excessive regulatory requirements as outlined by the European Union directive.

As seen in FT Adviser.

 


Testimonials

"We joined SimplyBiz in 2010, having been members of the Sesame Network in one guise or another for nearly 10 years. We decided to leave the network because we felt that in the latter years we were just a number and it was beginning to feel like being back at school!  I have to say that the SimplyBiz approach is totally refreshing and that we feel in control of our own business again, whilst still having a good robust compliance support provider to guide us. We have since recommended SimplyBiz to other colleagues and would have no hesitation in doing so again."

Grant Kingston
Braintree

Read More

Latest News

The vulnerability issue

December 12, 2017

Vital as it is to demonstrate compliance with the regulations on protecting vulnerable clients, writes Gary Kershaw, the FCA's guidelines really only formalise the warning signs advisers should be adept at reading.

Read more >

"Trouble finding an apprentice? Here's why"

December 06, 2017

Last week, we were informed of another stumbling block on the government’s disaster-filled path towards putting a viable apprenticeship funding plan in place.  

Read more >

"Enthusiasm, courage and goals lead to success"

November 27, 2017

By the time I left school at the age of 15, with no qualifications, I had been called a few choice names by my teachers and received many predictions about where my future lay.

Read more >

Staffcare relaunches as Zest and introduces cutting-edge employee benefits technology

November 22, 2017

Staffcare, one of the leading pioneers of the employee benefits market, today announced that it is relaunching its business as Zest and, simultaneously, launching its new benefits technology platform.

Read more >