"FCA needs to find a fairer way to fund the FSCS" "FCA needs to find a fairer way to fund the FSCS"

20 Feb 2017 Ken Davy

Past regulators, whether Fimbra, PIA, or the FSA all started off with great expectations, which ultimately ended in confusion for consumers and unsatisfactory outcomes for those they regulated.

Now the FCA, after a less than auspicious first few years, is under new leadership and the key question is, can it at last demonstrate that regulation can deliver the Holy Grail of good consumer outcomes and a vibrant, healthy financial services sector?

The vast majority of financial advisers are already playing their part in delivering good consumer outcomes

The vast majority of financial advisers are already playing their part in delivering good consumer outcomes, and it is time they benefited from the often promised 'regulatory dividend'.   I have consistently argued three points in relation to the FSCS.

Firstly, the current funding of the FSCS is grotesquely unfair to the financial advice sector.  Secondly, either a product levy or a levy on the funds received by product and investment providers would be both fairer and minuscule in its impact on any single organisation.  Thirdly, an added benefit of such a change would be to give providers a direct vested interest in helping to stamp out bad practices and phoney schemes because of their infinitely greater knowledge of the marketplace.

Some recent events have begun to vindicate these arguments, as providers have started to proactively consider client outcomes when accepting business or dubious switching requests.  Zurich are to be congratulated on setting up a 'scam line' in conjunction with the Pensions Advisory Service, as are Phoenix for stopping £30m of suspect pension transfers.

There is undoubtedly much more that could be done by providers without jeopardising their relationships with either advisers or clients, and contributing directly to the FSCS would dramatically accelerate this trend for the mutual benefit of all concerned.

I urge the FCA and HM Treasury to ensure that the present FSCS funding review acknowledges the significant enhancement of client outcomes which will flow from providers funding of the FSCS.  It will still have a degree of unfairness because it is impossible for the ‘polluters’ to pay, as they have gone bust or disappeared. It will however be the fairest system possible and will at the same time demonstrate to financial advisers that there really is 'a light at the end of the tunnel'.

Ken Davy is chairman of SimplyBiz Group


Testimonials

“We have nothing but praise for the entire team at SimplyBiz. With their guidance we were able to go directly authorised and are so glad we did, as we have never looked back. The service we receive is impeccable and our business receives great value for money.”

Chris Pratt
Nottingham

Read More

Latest News

"A princely way of looking at succession issues"

October 04, 2017

Seeing all the stories about Prince George starting school set me thinking about longevity and business succession issues for financial advisers.

Read more >

"Providers must allow tax deductible advice"

September 28, 2017

Knock, knock. Are you there? More importantly, are you listening?
I ask this question because of the enormous opportunities the current market is presenting for each and every adviser, whether working within a large firm or a one-person practice, as an independent adviser or restricted.

Read more >

Fos report is a dollop of gruel for advisers

September 19, 2017

Cold porridge and cold comfort have a lot in common: such meagre offerings do not come close to being satisfying.

Read more >

Adviser Landscape

September 14, 2017

SimplyBiz Group Chairman, Ken Davy, gives us his unique perspective on the biggest industry issues of recent months.

Read more >