"Scottish Widows addresses FSCS funding issue" "Scottish Widows addresses FSCS funding issue"

28 Jun 2017

As regular readers of this column will know, I have campaigned for more than two decades for the regulator to radically change how the FSCS is funded.

I was therefore encouraged to note earlier this year that the FCA strongly indicated it recognised the injustice of the current funding method. With the tide against the unfairness gathering momentum, I am now delighted to see a thoughtful and constructive piece on the future funding of the FSCS from Ronnie Taylor, distribution director of Scottish Widows.

For such a respected provider to acknowledge the injustice of the current funding is an important milestone. I believe all of us involved in the advice sector should be very encouraged to see this unfairness being acknowledged, first by the FCA and now by such a major provider.  

Mr Taylor's article, which you can view in full on Scottish Widows’ website, recognises that providers have a significant part to play in contributing to a solution. They have the ability to identify and avoid market risks and therefore help to ensure that the FSCS funding falls to a greater extent on those providers and firms creating the liabilities.

Product providers, as well as clients, benefit substantially from the existence of a strong, vibrant and successful financial advice sector. This has previously been recognised by many providers who voluntarily contributed to the FSCS levy to ensure the advice sector was not disproportionately penalised.  

It was also clearly acknowledged by the PIA which, within a £100m cap, proposed that approximately 85 per cent should be met by the providers that benefited from the business placed by advisers.

Going forward, it will clearly be important that the core funding of the FSCS involves contributions from providers to ensure their market knowledge is used proactively to reduce the number of calls on the FSCS, combined, where possible, with a higher proportion of costs falling upon those involved in producing or promoting higher risk products.  

Sharing costs across the product providers’ value chain, while also using risk-based levies and improvements in professional indemnity cover to change the funding of the FSCS, has the potential to reduce its overall liabilities while dramatically, and rightly, reducing the costs to financial advisers.

My congratulations go to Scottish Widows and Mr Taylor on such a helpful and constructive contribution to this important debate.  

Ken Davy is chairman of The SimplyBiz Group


Testimonials

“Just a quick note to say how amazed I have been at the calibre of your team at SimplyBiz. Since I signed up with you, they have been outstanding in every area. Prior to joining, I really did not trust a single individual in this industry but the facts are that SimplyBiz have delivered far more than they promised and come across as sincere and genuine. It really has been refreshing to work with people who are experienced and capable of running beyond the tape”

Owen Wintersgill
Byfleet

Read More

Latest News

Government must help meet the needs of the elderly

October 11, 2017

Being able to congratulate the FCA, while not by any means a first, is not something I am able to do regularly.

Read more >

"A princely way of looking at succession issues"

October 04, 2017

Seeing all the stories about Prince George starting school set me thinking about longevity and business succession issues for financial advisers.

Read more >

"Providers must allow tax deductible advice"

September 28, 2017

Knock, knock. Are you there? More importantly, are you listening?
I ask this question because of the enormous opportunities the current market is presenting for each and every adviser, whether working within a large firm or a one-person practice, as an independent adviser or restricted.

Read more >

Fos report is a dollop of gruel for advisers

September 19, 2017

Cold porridge and cold comfort have a lot in common: such meagre offerings do not come close to being satisfying.

Read more >